Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion


The subject of vaccines is extremely controversial. Most individuals have been taught from an early age that vaccines are safe and prevent disease. I wish that both of these statements were true, but I am now convinced, after extensive research and experience, that vaccines do not prevent disease and that they are far from safe.
Tremendous pressure is wielded by physicians, hospitals, public schools, family and friends to vaccinate. You must come to your own conclusions and stand firm, should you decided not to vaccinate. It is imperative to take time to do some independent research on this medical procedure. The health consequences of vaccinations, which include death, cannot be easily reversed, if at all.


Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion

Vaccine #FLU Shots STILL Contain 25 MicroGrams MERCURY – 100 TIMES the Concentration of ‘Mercury-Loaded’ Fish


Millions of Americans are getting injected every year with 100 times the #mercury they’re worried about in fish, because they read about the salmon or tuna in some newspaper clip or saw a quick spot on the news.

Now remember, since most of the mercury in the food will be processed by your body with the food, you may only retain 10 percent of the toxic heavy metal. But when the nurse, who doesn’t offer you to look at the box or read the insert, jabs that needle into your upper arm and rubs it with a little cotton swab, while that nurse tries to help you avoid the flu, you’re actually getting something much MORE dangerous to your health (mainstream, “lame-stream” media cannot and will not talk about this).

Intramuscular injections contain 100 times the concentration of mercury you find in certain fish

If you’re a flu shot “frequenter” — meaning that you get one nearly every fall or winter, you are actually doing the opposite of what the flu “industry” (CDC) tells you on the insert and the box inside which the influenza vaccine comes.

Yes, read it and you will know.

Ask the nurse and have him/her leave the room while you review it. The flu shot warning tells you NOT to get the shot again if you’ve already had it. It doesn’t say how recently, or even whether that was when you were a child. It just flat out tells you not to get another one.

So where does that put us with the whole vaccine schedule when you get 25 to 30 vaccines, including some flu shots, before the age of six?

How much mercury are you getting and did you get, cumulatively, over the years?

Is this why they warn you on the box and insert? (

Have you gotten a FluLaval shot EVER before?


Will you ever again?

SEE RELATED: CDC Caught Hiding Data Showing Mercury In Vaccines Is Linked To Autism

You thought mercury-loaded fish were bad for you, try a flu shot!

Do you take the wrong kind of fish oil supplements?

Threats from mercury are greater at lower levels than thought in the past. People go out to eat at restaurants and don’t even think twice about where the fish comes from. They eat tuna out of cans and can’t figure out their health problems, or the root causes. Then, they go and do something really dumb — they get a flu shot.

How can something so popular be such a “common-senseless” thing to do? Maybe because the people getting them are still mentally challenged from the last one they got?

How would you like to “consume” 25,000 times as much mercury (level) as is the maximum allowed by the EPA for water?

By injecting mercury into your blood directly, it also bypasses digestion, lung filtration and other natural defenses that your body would rather use to combat this heavy metal toxic nightmare.

We are talking about 51 parts per million of inorganic mercury, but it’s supposed to help you fight off the flu, which your body should already be able to do just fine, if you weren’t eating GMOs daily and getting vaccines yearly!

SEE RELATED: Bill Gates Admits Vaccines Are Used for Human Depopulation [VIDEO]


Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion

Ireland Fights HPV Vaccine Injury & Big Pharma Control



By Jefferey Jaxen

The world is watching as Irish communities have gained public, political and mainstream media traction. Irish families have faced an uphill battle against a pharmaceutical invasion of their healthcare system. Loss of informed consent and medical ethics at the hands of the school system has come between parental rights. HPV vaccine injury from Gardasil & Cervarix is mounting as the country’s medical system plays catch-up to help its injured daughters. Yet acknowledgment within Irish healthcare and politics is still slowed by the crippling pharmaceutical control and conflicts of interest that remains.

Visit R.E.G.R.E.T Ireland’s HPV Vaccine Injury Support Group


Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion

Bayer CropScience and Bee Deaths


The Big Picture

For several years now there has been a dramatic loss of bees in Europe and North America.

As many as 50% to 90% of the bee populations have simply vanished. This is a big deal.

Bees are a keystone species – they are vital to the food chain on our planet. An international study of 115 food crops grown in over 200 countries showed that 75% of crops are pollinated by animals, especially by bees.

At first it was believed that only honeybees were affected, but then bumblebee populations began to decline.

The crisis was eventually given a name: Colony Collapse Disorder or CCD.

CCD is Not a Disease

There were initially several theories about the cause of CCDE, including,

However, it has now been proven that the bee deaths are actually the result of poisoning from two known pesticides called clothianidin and imidacloprid – manufactured by Bayer.

Imidacloprid, “Gaucho”

The trade name for clothianidin is Poncho.

The trade names for imidacloprid include,

  • Gaucho

  • Admire

  • Advantage

  • Merit

  • Amigo

  • Premise

  • Prothor

  • Winner

Why are They Used?

One of our most important crops is corn.

But corn has an enemy called diabrotica virgifera vergifera – also known as the “root worm.” It burrows into the roots of the corn plant and causes the plant to wither and eventually die.

Major infestations can wipe-out entire crops.

As bad as it sounds, the root worm problem can actually be addressed quite easily with the practice of crop rotation.

The larvae must feed on corn roots to survive and cannot travel more than 10 to 20 inches if hatched in a field rotated out of corn. However, rotating a field out of corn can result in lower farm profitability if there is less demand for the alternate crop.

So in 2003, Bayer Pharmaceutical introduced two pesticides, classified as neonicotinoids, to combat root worms and capitalize on increased farm profits. These pesticides are now two of Bayer’s top agricultural products – even though profits are at the expense of a keystone species.

Corn seed is coated with Bayer’s pesticides by means of an adhesive developed by another industry giant: Monsanto.

Despite studies which showed these pesticides are highly toxic to bees, their use was justified with the reasoning that the corn seed to which they were applied would be buried in the soil where it would presumably be harmless to other creatures. This was a grave mistake.

The first clue that Colony Collapse Disorder was the result of poisoning, similar to the DDT bird kill-off decades ago, was when clothianidin was used on corn crops in Germany’s state of Baden-Wurttemberg. In July of 2007, the German crop was infested with root worms.

The German government ordered that every possible method should be used to eradicate this pest, including the use of neonicotinoids. Shortly after the seeds were planted, in May of 2008, some 330-million bees abruptly died. The global phenomenon has continued to this day, resulting in millions of dead colonies… billions of dead bees.

An investigation revealed that the seed coating did not stay in the soil but was introduced to the air (and the rest of the plant) by simple abrasion – the rubbing together of seeds – as they are stored, moved and planted.

The German government quickly banned this pesticide, gave compensation to the farmers and issued a strong warning against using this chemical in agriculture.

According to the German Federal Agriculture Institute,

“It can unequivocally be concluded that poisoning of the bees is due to the rub-off of the pesticide ingredient clothianidin from corn seeds.”

According to the German Research Center for Cultivated Plants, 29 out of 30 dead bees had been killed, in the 2008 study, by direct contact with clothianidin.

Philipp Mimkes, spokesman for the German-based Coalition Against Bayer Dangers, said:

“We have been pointing out the risks of neonicotinoids for almost 10 years now. This proves without a doubt that the chemicals can come into contact with bees and kill them. These pesticides shouldn’t be on the market.”

More Research

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (May 30, 2003):

“Clothianidin has the potential for toxic chronic exposure to honey bees, as well as other non-target pollinators, through the translocation of clothianidin residue in nectar and pollen.”

“The fate and disposition of clothianidin in the environment suggest a compound that is asystemic insecticide that is persistent and mobile, stable to hydrolysis, and has potential to leach to ground water, as well as runoff to surface waters.”

“Clothianidin is highly toxic to honey bees on an acute contact basis (killing 50% of tested populations at greater than 389 mg/kg). It has the potential for toxic chronic exposure to honey bees, as well as other non-target pollinators, through the translocation of clothianidin residues in nectar and pollen.

In honey bees, the effects of this toxic chronic exposure may include lethal and/or sub-lethal effects in the larvae and reproductive effects in the queen.”

Bees can be exposed in two primary ways: through nectar from plants and through high-fructose corn syrup beekeepers use to feed their bees.

Since most U.S.-grown corn has been treated with imidacloprid, it’s also found in corn syrup.

The tragedy in Germany and France showed that bees exposed to clothianidin also infected bee colonies that were not harvesting corn pollen, thus spreading the toxin to regions some distance from cultivating corn plants. It is believed that affected bees could have become disoriented and mingled with bees from other colonies or contaminated the pollen of plants where other bee colonies were also pollinating.

There is also evidence that imidacloprid can produce colony collapse at levels far below those used in agriculture. In the summer of 2010, researchers conducted an in situ study in Worcester County, Massachusetts aimed at replicating how imidacloprid may have caused the CCD outbreak.

Over a 23-week period, they monitored bees in four different bee yards; each yard had four hives treated with different levels of imidacloprid and one control hive.
After 12 weeks of imidacloprid dosing, all the bees were alive. But after 23 weeks, 15 out of 16 of the imidacloprid-treated hives – 94% had died. Those exposed to the highest levels of the pesticide died first.

The characteristics of the dead hives were consistent with CCD; the hives were empty except for food stores, some pollen, and young bees, with few dead bees nearby.

When other conditions cause hive collapse, such as disease or pests, many dead bees are typically found inside and outside the affected hives.

Strikingly, it took only low levels of imidacloprid to cause hive collapse – less than what is typically used in crops or in areas where bees forage.

Neonicotinoids Result in Bee Colony Collapse

The tobacco industry once touted that smoking a few cigarettes doesn’t give a person lung cancer, which is arguably true.

Though today, nobody is fooled by this kind of double-speak regarding tobacco. Likewise, Bayer is quick to claim that feeding bees a specific amount of neonicotinoids, doesn’t kill the bees. This is more double-speak.

While trace amounts of neonicotinoids may not kill bees outright, they do interfere with the ability of bees to navigate to and from the hive.

This is exactly what beekeepers and farmers have been reporting: half empty or abandoned hives with no dead bodies to be found anywhere. It has also been noted that the empty colonies are absent the usual parasitic bugs that typically take advantage of an abandoned hive. The colonies appear sterile.

The pollen that they do manage to bring back to the hive is then further concentrated and exposed to the entire colony, causing suppression of their immune systems and subsequent infection by any number of parasites and pathogens.

People demonstrate against Bayer pesticides on behalf of bees

April 21st, 2007 at the Bayer headquarters in Brussels.

Billions of bees have died each year since Bayer

introduced Gaucho and Poncho pesticides to the market.

The poster reads: ’Gaucho Bayer, only kills if one uses it.’

What Has Bayer Done About It?

According to the Bayer website, they addressed the issue at Baden-Wurttemberg by holding,

“intensive discussions within the seed industry to develop measures for maintaining and monitoring the quality of seed coatings.”

Then their,

“second major step” was the “technical optimization of pneumatic sewing machines.”

Seriously?!? Yes.

In other words: they have given the problem thorough lip service without addressing the real problem: their pesticides. They even claim to help bees with other products…

As Bayer continues propagating the conspiracy theory that Varroa mites are the biggest problem facing bee hives, they have also conveniently developed a solution. Of course it is another pesticide. This one is called CheckMite+ and has some serious problems of its own.

Studies conducted on beeswax queen cups contaminated with CheckMite+ at various concentrations far below the allowable limits were catastrophic. Very few queens survived the graft, and those that did hatch were underweight and had problems mating.

So why is Bayer’s subterfuge allowed to continue?

Money Talks

The bottom line is that neonicotinoids account for much of Bayer’s agrochemical profits since over 90% of US corn acreage is treated with them – and Bayer’s influence is very strong in both science and politics, as demonstrated by their history…

Many people think of Bayer simply as the company that makes aspirin since that is how they were founded.

But they also produce many extremely toxic substances. In fact, Bayer was one of five companies that formed IG Farben in a 1925 merger. IG Farben was a huge Nazi supporter, and held the patent for the pesticide Zyklon B – which was used in Holocaust gas chambers.

They also owned 42.2 percent of the company which manufactured it.

Even more sickening, IG Farben used the Auschwitz facility to test its chemicals on human subjects.

In 1948, directors of IG Farben were indicted at a U.S. military tribunal, and at the subsequent Nuremberg Trials, where many were sentenced to prison for their horrible war crimes. Due to the severity of the crimes committed by IG Farben during World War II, the company was considered to be too corrupt to be allowed to continue to exist.

It was officially put into liquidation in 1952, but this does not mean the company ceased to be a legal entity. It continues even today as a corporation “in liquidation”, meaning that the purpose of the continuing existence of the corporation is being dissolved in an orderly fashion. Its shares are still traded on German markets.

Clearly too many powerful people stood to lose too much money if IG Farben had been liquidated immediately.

The same is true of Bayer, which was obviously allowed to continue operations (along with partners BASF and Agfa). After all, it would have been a shame to waste the profits from all that research. So now the world is once again faced with a Bayer holocaust – only this time it is against the earth’s bee population.

Bayer will stop at nothing to make a profit… when will they be held accountable?

Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion

Biological Warfare – Experimentation On The American People

February 26, 2016

By Suzanne Maher

Dr. Garth Nicolson discusses biological experiments which have been done for many decades on the unsuspecting population.  He discusses the Gulf War Syndrome and the 100,000 men and women who contracted it during their time serving.

Mycoplasmas, Borrelia, Chlymydia, Rickettsia, Brucella, Coxiella infections have been deployed using;

  1. Vaccines;
  2. Plumes from bombing;
  3. Purposeful seeding of exclusionary regions
  4. SCUD
  5. Endogenous Sources (air, sand, water)

Generally these infections manifest as slow growing infections, which are hard to treat and are not responsive to antibiotics.

Additionally, there is an Aluminum Statute; Title 50, Section 1521 which allows the Department of Defense to use biological and chemical weapons without penalty.

Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion

The Impact of Vaccination on the Immature Human Immune System

by Kate Raines

Little is known about how vaccination affects the developing fetus and, yet, maternal vaccination with influenza and Tdap vaccines is recommended by federal health officials and medical trade organizations representing doctors administering vaccines to pregnant women.1

A recent study purporting to demonstrate that vaccination during pregnancy is perfectly safe retrospectively looked at data on 29,000 pregnant women who had all been vaccinated with the TdaP vaccine. All the study showed was that there was no difference in fetal outcome, regardless of whether the mothers had been previously vaccinated with a tetanus-containing vaccine less than two years earlier, three to five years earlier, or longer.2

It is difficult to figure how comparisons of study populations, who have all been vaccinated, demonstrates anything at all about the safety of vaccination, but that is an example of the unquestioning acceptance of vaccine policy.

The impact of vaccination on the developing immune system has not been clarified and, unfortunately, many women are being vaccinated during pregnancy despite large knowledge gaps about the safety and effectiveness of that policy.

The Immature Immune System

A child’s immune system is not fully functional until about age six and continues to develop through the teen years. That is not to say an infant is without an immune system, only that it behaves in ways remarkably different from that of older children and adults.3

Current thinking is that a newborn’s immune system is “tamped down” and doesn’t mount much of a response to challenge from pathogenic viruses, bacteria, or other invaders. For a long time, the ability of newborn infants to mount an appropriate inflammatory response to an immunologic challenge was considered a “defect” of the infant’s immune system, with many scientists researching ways to overcome this intrinsic “weakness” via vaccination.4

More recently, it has been established that there are good reasons for the differences between the newborn and older child or adult immune response. The baby’s immature immune system is learning “what is self” (and so should not be attacked), “what is non-self but safe” (like beneficial bacteria and viruses), and “what is non-self but dangerous (like pathogenic disease-causing viruses or bacteria).

Vaccination violates this normal development of the newborn’s immune system by introducing elements that are so toxic that the infant’s immune system must react with inflammation. Dr. Suzanne Humphries explains it this way:

Subunit vaccines like HepB,  Strep Pneumo, Hib and Meningococcal  have potent ‘adjuvants’—such as aluminum.  Without them, the baby’s immune system sits there and does nothing. An adjuvant creates a red-alert situation forcing the infant’s innate immune system to respond in the opposite manner to the way it should function in the first year of life. Pro-vaccine immunologists see nothing wrong with this.5

Much has been written about why the pregnant woman’s immune system doesn’t attack the alien “non-self” that is her fetus.6 7 The lack of reactivity of the unborn baby also may protect the mother from being attacked by the infant’s defense system.8 Pointing to yet another benefit to the minimal activity of the fetal/newborn immune system, animal studies suggest strongly that the normal suppression of immune reaction by the fetus also may play an important role in helping the infant to establish a strong population of beneficial gut bacteria, an important aspect of the healthy immune system.8

In that study of infant mice, the researchers deactivated the specific type of protein that was responsible for restraining the immune response in the study animals and reported that the result was “extensive inflammation.” Mice and humans have very different immune system processes of course, but it is interesting to note that those same researchers reported that human umbilical cord blood is rich in precisely the same type of immunosuppressive protein as found in the mouse study.8

What Protects the Vulnerable Newborn?

Given the susceptibility of newborn infants and the relative inactivity of their immune responses, it almost miraculous that so many humans survive infancy. It is often argued that infant mortality has fallen over the last 100 years primarily as a result of vaccination, but it is also argued that the improvement in infant survival is due instead to better hygiene, nutrition, and living conditions.

If the reductions in infant mortality were attributable mainly to vaccines, infant mortality rates in the United States would not lag as they do behind those of most other developed nations. According to 2014 data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC):

Despite recent declines in infant mortality, the United States ranked 26th among the 29 OECD countries in 2010, behind most European countries as well as Japan, Korea, Israel, Australia, and New Zealand.9

Nature has its ways of protecting the newborn: During the prenatal period, and for the first few months of infancy, young infants are protected first by the mother’s immunity, which is shared with the newborn via the placenta and lasts for several months after birth, then through the billions of microorganisms picked up during the birth process as the child descends through the vaginal canal.10 This natural process will form the basis of the child’s customized microbiome that will remain with the individual throughout life, and then to a large degree through breastfeeding until the child’s own immune system takes over.

Tampering With the Fetal Environment Has Critical Repercussions

Public health officials, who promote vaccination during pregnancy, at-birth and during the first six months of life, have assumed that the immunologic protection provided by the maternal immune system to the newborn baby is something that needs to be bypassed or tampered with. Although they were not referring to vaccination, researchers out of the University of Guelph in Ontario explain that,

Adverse uterine environments experienced during fetal development can alter the projected growth pattern of various organs and systems of the body, leaving the offspring at an increased risk of metabolic disease.11 

As examples of what they call the “thrifty phenotype hypothesis,” referring to a fetus’s adaptive response to maternal stressors, they cite what happens to newborns born during times of famine, which appears to signal the developing baby to divert its resources away from physical growth and toward protecting its organs, resulting in smaller babies—better equipped to survive and grow in an environment where food may be scarce.

The problems arise when the external environment doesn’t match the internal signals and the fetal adaptations turn out to be inappropriate, leading to an increased risk of metabolic disease, which includes obesity, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and type II diabetes. According to these researchers:

Various other diseases and disorders such as allergies, asthma, Alzheimer’s disease, and psychological disorders are now also being linked with adverse uterine environments.11 

What happens when the normal fetal environment is altered by the introduction of inflammation-inducing vaccines? To challenge an unborn or newborn infant’s immune system in this manner requires a thorough scientific understanding of the potential long-term consequences and there is no such understanding at this time.