Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion, Global Public Envirornmental movement against geoengineering

CHEMTRAILS & HOLE PUNCH CLOUDS OVER GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA Harold Saive * November 14, 2011

16142977_858162574287407_6912559894095072481_n

HOLE PUNCH CLOUD ~ LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA USA
Video * January 22, 2017
https://www.facebook.com/francisco.v.manriquez/videos/1340981355958970/

HOLE PUNCH CLOUDS OVER SO. CALIFORNIA
January 23, 2017
https://www.facebook.com/NBCBayArea/posts/10154109217081990

UNNATURAL CLOUD FORMATION
Video * January 12, 2017
Location unknown
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=851043411665990&set=gm.1459265957440580&type=3

VIDEO: HOLE-PUNCH CLOUD OVER PORTUGAL
January 2, 2016
https://www.facebook.com/1548618732085120/videos/1657745541172438/

HOLES IN HEAVEN
Narrated by Martin Sheen
The Disclosure Network * October 13, 2010
Examines the controversial military program based on Tesla technology – its possible effects on weather and use in mind control. Based on advances in technology created by Nikola Tesla over a century ago, HAARP – High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project – is a controversial high frequency radio transmitter operated by the US military beaming high level energy into the Earth’s upper atmosphere. Ostensibly for ionospheric research, HAARP also locates hidden oil reserves and missile silos around the world. However, critics of HAARP say this technology could blow a massive hole in the upper atmosphere as well as disrupt the subtle magnetic energies of all life on Earth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9uwmBGrrVE

Estándar

16640822_1603492729679041_3160837570805554543_n

Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion, Global Public Envirornmental movement against geoengineering

Manipulating nature at the atomic level.Turning moisture droplets into plasma to manipulate the atmosphere.#NEXRAD #H.A.A.R.P

Imagen
Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion, Global Public Envirornmental movement against geoengineering

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025

owning-weather-2025if
A Research Paper
Presented To
Air Force
2025
by
Col Tamzy J. House
Lt Col James B. Near, Jr.
LTC William B. Shields (USA)
Maj Ronald J. Celentano
Maj David M. Husband
Maj Ann E. Mercer
Maj James E.
Pugh
August 1996
Disclaimer
2025
is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government.
This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only.
This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities, is unclassified, and is cleared for public release.

 

Estándar
Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion, Global Public Envirornmental movement against geoengineering

Our Oceans’ Changing Electromagnetic Environment

Christopher Fontenot July 17, 2016

whales.jpg

Our oceans are fast becoming a killing field for many marine mammals and other sea dwellers. Beachings are occurring with more frequency than ever. Mass fish kills are a common occurrence. Scientists are calling this the “Sixth Great Extinction Event”. Yet, few are correlating these changes to increases in energy and perturbations in the electromagnetic spectrum. Modern technology is having a profound impact on marine life, the likes of which hasn’t been witnessed by modern man.

In order to understand why our oceans are highly susceptible to electromagnetic radiation (EMR), it’s important to know the characteristics of EMR in water.

“Electromagnetic propagation through water is very different from propagation through air because of water’s high permittivity and electrical conductivity. Plane wave attenuation is high compared to air, and increases rapidly with frequency. With a relative permittivity of 80, water has among the highest permittivity of any material and this has a significant impact on the angle of refraction at the air/water interface.”

“Conductivity of seawater is typically around 4S/m, while nominally ‘fresh’ water conductivity is quite variable but typically in the mS/m range. At-tenuation of em signals is much lower in fresh water than in seawater, but fresh water has a similar permittivity. Relative permeability is approximately 1, so there is little direct effect on the magnetic field component. Loss is largely due to the effect of conduction on the electric field component. Propagating waves continually cycle energy between the electric and magnetic fields; hence conduction leads to strong attenuation of electromagnetic propagating waves.”
http://www.hydro-international.com/content/article/underwater-electromagnetic-propagation

Marine mammals are experiencing an onslaught of attack from many sources. The military admittedly kills millions of cetaceans by sonar, seismic, and electromagnetic technology. The estimated audible range for all cetaceans is between 7 Hz and 180 kHz.

audible whales
https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/AE439D96-BD72-4D1E-BB99-0C8E228E0F13/0/BA_MarineNoiseFrequ.pdf

“Unfortunately for many whales, dolphins and other marine life, the use of underwater sonar (short for sound navigation and ranging) can lead to injury and even death. Sonar systems—first developed by the U.S. Navy to detect enemy submarines—generate slow-rolling sound waves topping out at around 235 decibels; the world’s loudest rock bands top out at only 130. These sound waves can travel for hundreds of miles under water, and can retain an intensity of 140 decibels as far as 300 miles from their source.”

“These rolling walls of noise are no doubt too much for some marine wildlife. While little is known about any direct physiological effects of sonar waves on marine species, evidence shows that whales will swim hundreds of miles, rapidly change their depth (sometime leading to bleeding from the eyes and ears), and even beach themselves to get away from the sounds of sonar.”
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-military-sonar-kill/

Whales and other marine species use the Earth’s Geomagnetic Stress Lines (GSLs) to navigate/migrate. These GSLs correlate with the Earth’s magnetic field and are a natural occurring phenomena used by many species for this purpose. During geomagnetic storms, the GSLs may change drastically. These rapid changes are the primary cause of stranding and poor navigation.

“The beaching and stranding of whales and dolphins around the world has been mystifying scientists for centuries. Although many theories have been proposed, few are substantiated by unequivocal statistical evidence. Advances in the field of animal magnetoreception have established that many organisms, including cetaceans, have an internal ‘compass,’ which they use for orientation when traveling long distances.”

“Astrobiology involves not only the origin and distribution of life in the universe, but also the scientific study of how extraterrestrial conditions affect evolution of life on planet Earth. The focus of this study is how cetacean life is influenced by disturbances in its environment that originate from an astrological phenomenon – in the present study that involves solar flares and cetacean beachings. Solar storms are caused by major coronal eruptions on the Sun. Upon reaching Earth, they cause disturbances in Earth’s normally stable magnetosphere. Unable to follow an accurate magnetic bearing under such circumstances, cetaceans lose their compass reading while travelling and, depending on their juxtaposition and nearness to land, eventually beach themselves.
(1) This hypothesis was supported by six separate, independent surveys of beachings: (A) in the Mediterranean Sea, (B) the northern Gulf of Mexico, (C) the east and (D) west coasts of the USA and two surveys (E and F) from around the world. When the six surveys were pooled (1614 strandings), a highly significant correlation (R2 = 0.981) of when strandings occurred with when major geomagnetic disturbances in Earth’s magnetosphere occurred was consistent with this hypothesis.
(2) Whale and dolphin strandings in the northern Gulf of Mexico and the east coast of the USA were correlated (R2 = 0.919, R2 = 0.924) with the number of days before and after a geomagnetic storm.
(3) Yearly strandings were correlated with annual geomagnetic storm days.
(4) Annual beachings of cetaceans from 1998 to 2012 were linearly correlated (R2 = 0.751) with frequency of annual sunspot numbers. Thus, consistently strong statistical correlation evidence indicates that an astronomical phenomenon – solar flares – can cause cetaceans to change their behaviour and become disoriented, which eventually causes them to swim onto a shore and beach themselves.”
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=10380862

These correlations between geomagnetic storms and beachings fail to mention man-made perturbations of the Earth’s Ionospheric layers. The geomagnetic field of Earth can be perturbed via ionospheric heaters. These heaters modulate an Alfven wave resonance in the Earth’s Ionosphere, precisely as witnessed during increased solar activity.

“Ionospheric heaters located in Polar Regions (EISCAT, HAARP, HIPAS) have been used extensively to generate electromagnetic waves in the ULF/VLF/ELF frequency range and this concept has been referred as the Polar Electrojet (PEJ) antenna. A major problem with the PEJ is its reliance in the presence and strength of the electrojet current. This restricts not only the location of the heater but makes their generation highly unpredictable. A new concept of using HF heating to generate a virtual antenna in the ionospheric Hall region at ULF/ELF frequencies without relying in the existence of electrojets, was advanced recently by Papdopoulos et al. (2010). The current drive and the creation of a virtual ELF antenna are accomplished in two steps. First, F region heating generates a diamagnetic current with a field aligned magnetic moment. Second, the electric field of the magnetosonic wave radiated by the F region magnetic moment drives a Hall current when it reaches the bottom of the ionosphere.”
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&arnumber=6051168

In light of the roll out of 5G cellular technology and proposed wifi on board satellites, mankind will face serious consequences for our ignorance in utilizing unnatural vibrations. Nature took millions of years to establish what mankind has thrown into chaos in less than 100.

While we contemplate our need to advance technology and control of our EM spectrum, perhaps we should step back and examine the consequences of our actions. Our planet is suffering an ‘Extinction Level Event’. Do we have the will to stop it? Or will our children be the last to witness the breaching of a Humpback in Arctic waters?

https://amicrowavedplanet.com/our-oceans-changing-electromagnetic-environment/

 

Estándar
Conocimiento, Consciencia, Educacion

The Destruction of our Forest through Geo-Engineering

Christopher Fontenot June 28, 2016

network_tree

Our environment is awash in Electromagnetic pollution. Trees are particularly susceptible to devastation caused by this man-made electromagnetic radiation because of they serve as an electrical interface between Earth and atmospheric currents. The future of trees grows dim as technology advances to exploit fully, the EM spectrum.

“Transient electric potential variations have been observed in a standing poplar tree equipped with electrodes up to a height of 10.5 m. The simultaneous signals at all electrodes have the same shape and their amplitude grows linearly with height, up to values of 10 to 50 mV. This corresponds to an electric current through the tree of the order of a few mA. The frequency of appearance of the signals does not depend on the season or on the time of the day.”

“It is suggested that the potential variations are caused by the passage of thunderstorm clouds, of little activity, whose electrically charged base could induce charges in the ground and give rise to a current flowing through the tree and discharging at its top by point discharge.”

“Studies of the electric potential and atmospheric conductivity at the ground surface were vigorous, up to the Second World War. Every magnetic observatory was also equipped with sensors or recorders of the electric potential. Noted physicists were engaged in the study of the electrical conductivity of the atmosphere. The 5th division of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) was called ‘‘Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity’’.

“In the middle of the 20th century, the interest waned, but a renewal of interest might well be on its way. Indeed, the vertical downward current Jz, from the ionosphere, through the troposphere to the Earth’s surface (ocean and land), flowing through layer clouds, generates space charges at the upper and lower boundaries of these clouds, capable of affecting the microphysical interactions between the droplets, ice forming nuclei and condensation nuclei, leading to changes in the cloud cover. Short-term meteorological responses to changes in Jz have been observed. Changes in the ‘‘global electrical circuit’’ may provide a candidate for explanation of sun-weather climate over a large range of periods (Tinsley et al., 2007).”

“The capability for trees and forests to generate strong temporal and spatial heterogeneities in Jz might be of some significance and should be investigated more in depth.”
http://www.ipgp.fr/~gibert/PDF_Files/60.pdf

In addition, other studies indicate serious concerns for deforestation due to EM radiation and particulate pollution. But, they fail to acknowledge the impact of chemtrailing nano-particulates, such as Aluminum.

“Radiation from Wi-Fi networks is harmful to trees, causing significant variations in growth, as well as bleeding and fissures in the bark, according to a recent study in the Netherlands.
All deciduous trees in the Western world are affected, according to the study by a group of institutions, including the TU Delft University and Wageningen University. The city of Alphen aan den Rijn ordered the study five years ago after officials found unexplained abnormalities on trees that couldn’t be ascribed to a virus or bacterial infection.”

“Additional testing found the disease to occur throughout the Western world. In the Netherlands, about 70 percent of all trees in urban areas show the same symptoms, compared with only 10 percent five years ago. Trees in densely forested areas are hardly affected.”
http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/apple/study-finds-wi-fi-makes-trees-sick-3249437/

The use of man-made electromagnetic transmitters for the intended purpose of Geo-engineering the planet has to be considered in the discussion of acidification, electrification, and Solar Radiation Management(Chemtrailing) of our environment.Forests are stressed by intense changes in electrical potential. Electromagnetic pollution from man-made sources is the ‘Elephant in the Room’.

https://amicrowavedplanet.com/the-destruction-of-our-forest-through-geoengineering/

Estándar